- #5 SHADER NTLITE MOVIE#
- #5 SHADER NTLITE MP4#
- #5 SHADER NTLITE TRIAL#
- #5 SHADER NTLITE TV#
- #5 SHADER NTLITE FREE#
Total 12TB of four external WD drives for backup. + x2 WD BLACK 2TB internal SATA 7,200rpm hard drives.I for internal projects 1 for Library clips/sounds/music/stills./backup of working projects. Driver version 30.0.101.1069 with 32GB of 3200MHz Corsair DDR4 ram.ġ x 250GB SSD D: drive for C: drive backup 1 x 250GB SamSung Evo 970 drive for Operating System. Intel i9900K Coffee Lake 3.6 to 5.1GHz CPU with Intel UHD 630 Graphics. Page file space 4.75GB.Īsus ROG STRIX Z390-F Gaming motherboard Rev 1.xx with Supreme FX inboard audio using the S1220A code. Direct X 12.1 Bios version 1401 latest hardware updates for Western Digital hard drives. Personally I would say go for MEP 2020 Premium.
#5 SHADER NTLITE MOVIE#
I have been using Movie Edit Pro since version 11, having moved from other budget, mid and high end video editors, and its best feature is the flexibility in terms of track usage, ie you can put any video, images, titles and audio (objects) on any track, you are not restricted to having specific tracks for specific types of objects, there are many other reasons and a logical work flow.
#5 SHADER NTLITE FREE#
If it were more in the neighborhood of 30 seconds (like a free High End competitor) I might buy MEP 2020. The problem I have with 'performance testing' is that until we have identical standard set of projects at FullHD, 2K and 4K resolutions for example, comparisons are going to be indicative only.
#5 SHADER NTLITE MP4#
The 3 minute clip, with nothing done to it, took 1 minute to encode.Īssuming the export was MP4 h.264 at the same resolution, then that is, IMO, a very good rate of 90 fps - I have tested a similar resolution project on my system - see my signature, and get a similar fps rate - the project included transitions, a variety of effects. (Although if the iGPU isn't optimized for my low res test clip, then why isn't the CPU going to 100% to make up for it?)įWIW, I have Real Time Windows Defender turned. Maybe it flies at 2K or 4K? If that's your experience, I would like knowing that too. I could make some hand waving argument that the hardware encoding in the UHD 630 isn't optimized for odd ball, low res clips like this. So could I trouble a few of you with similar or even higher end systems to encode a like 3 minute clip and tell me how long it takes your system? I mean, I was expecting the cores or the GPU to be near 100%. Yeah, that's 3x faster than the same clip running on my 8 core AMD with a GTX-960, which ran all 8 cores at 50% and the GPU at zero. The 4 cores ran at about 20% and the iGPU at 18%.
#5 SHADER NTLITE TV#
(It was a 2 hour TV movie, trimmed to 3 minutes.) The 3 minute clip, with nothing done to it, took 1 minute to encode. It is 768 x 432 (kind of an odd ball resolution, from OBS), 30 fps.
#5 SHADER NTLITE TRIAL#
Since the trial version is limited to 3 minute exports, I tested encoding on a 3 minute clip. So I installed the trial version of MEP 2020 Plus. (As you all probably know, Intel finally got competitive with the 8th gen chips, and the lowly i3 now has four real cores and more 元 cache.) Now that I have it, I was curious to see how MEP would do with QuickSync, since the i3-8100 has the UHD 630 iGPU in it. In a way, I still haven't bought an Intel or Win10, although recently I bought a used Dell computer that has an Intel 8th gen i3 and Win10 Home in it. (The former which has kept me from upgrading MEP, since Magix says that MEP is optimized for Intel's QuickSync.) I have said in this forum that I would never buy an Intel CPU or go to Win10.